![]() Some image-hosting platforms have banned AI-generated content for fear of legal blowback. But the legal questions are beginning to affect business. The generative AI space remains healthy - it raised $1.3 billion in venture funding through November 2022, according to PitchBook, up 15% from the year prior. Meanwhile, an academic study published in December found that image-generating AI models like DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion can and do replicate aspects of images from their training data. In a recent example, an AI tool used by CNET to write explanatory articles was found to have plagiarized articles written by humans - articles presumably swept up in its training dataset. Two companies behind popular AI art tools, Midjourney and Stability AI, are in the crosshairs of a legal case that alleges they infringed on the rights of millions of artists by training their tools on web-scraped images.Īnd just last week, stock image supplier Getty Images took Stability AI to court for reportedly using millions of images from its site without permission to train Stable Diffusion, an art-generating AI.Īt issue, mainly, is generative AI’s tendency to replicate images, text and more - including copyrighted content - from the data that was used to train it. Microsoft, GitHub and OpenAI are currently being sued in a class action motion that accuses them of violating copyright law by allowing Copilot, a code-generating AI system trained on billions of lines of public code, to regurgitate licensed code snippets without providing credit. As generative AI enters the mainstream, each new day brings a new lawsuit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |